Tony Blair

Tony Blair was the Prime Minister of the United Kingdom and leader of the Labour Party. He resigned from the position in June 2007.

In January 2008, the Financial Times reported that Blair had agreed to become a part-time adviser to the global financial services firm JPMorgan Chase. The newspaper reported that Blair "will use his experience and contacts to provide political and strategic advice to the US bank and participate in some client events." Blair resigned as leader of the parliamentary wing of British Labor Party in June 2007. While the fee for the position has not been disclosed, a New York recruitment firm suggested that it "was likely to be more than $1m (£500,000) a year." Blair stated that he was looking at accepting "a small handful" of similar positions with other companies. "I have always been interested in commerce and the impact of globalisation. Nowadays, the intersection between politics and the economy in different parts of the world, including the emerging markets, is very strong," he said.

In Government
Blair had been widely criticised from within his own party for championing the policy on Iraq of U.S. President George W. Bush. There is a general perception in the UK that Blair repeatedly misled the UK parliament and public in echoing the U.S. claims that Saddam Hussein had weapons of mass destruction and that invading and occupying Iraq was legal. As a result, some Members of Parliament have formed a group to call for impeachment hearings.

Further pressure was put on Blair in September 2004, during the UK Labour Party conference, when the London Evening Standard newspaper published details of a leaked Pentagon briefing paper, Operation Iraqi Freedom: Strategic Lessons Learned. The document reveals that in October 2002, the Pentagon finalized its Full Operational Battle Plan 1003V for the Iraq war, at a time when Blair was insisting that no decisions had been made about whether to go to war.

Tony Blair is a member of the Fabian Society, the America APPG, and patron of the Foreign Policy Centre.

No Nukes in 97
When Tony Blair and the Labour Party were elected in 1997, the party committed itself to renewable energy sources such as solar and wind power but said in its manifesto that &#39;we see no economic case for the building of any new nuclear power stations.&#39;

No Nukes in 01
It was a line that Blair reiterated in the run up to the 2001 election. &#39;We have absolutely no plans to expand nuclear power,&#39; Blair said during the election campaign.

But just weeks after his second election victory, in June 2001 Blair and the government announced they were undertaking the largest review of energy for twenty years, to be undertaken by Number 10&#39;s Performance and Innovation Unit (PIU), under the guidance of a ministerial committee led by the pro-nuclear minister Brian Wilson. &#39;The review will be set within the context of meeting the challenge of global warming while ensuring secure, diverse and reliable energy supplies at a competitive price,&#39; said Blair.

At the time, the review was seen as &#39;a move that could lead to a long-term revival for nuclear power&#39; according to the Financial Times. Likewise the Independent said it &#39;opens way for a nuclear comeback;&#39;

Blair also argued that the review would provide the basis for the Government's response to the Royal Commission on Environmental Pollution&#39;s report called "The Changing Climate" that had been published in 2000. The RCEP&#39;s report had argued that by 2050 carbon dioxide emissions should be 60 per cent below their 1990 level. It also concluded that that there should be no development in the UK's nuclear power capacity until the issue of nuclear waste processing and storage had been addressed.

Nukes now Important
When the results of the energy review were leaked in February 2002, the then Energy Minister, Brian Wilson argued that &#39;Nuclear energy generators will continue to have an important role in meeting Britain's power needs&#39;.

When the review was published, it argued that the government should set an ambitious target of meeting 20 per cent of Britain's energy needs from renewable sources by 2020. It also recommended that the Government should also &#39;take the necessary steps&#39; to keep the option of nuclear power open. "Nowhere in the world have new nuclear stations yet been financed within a liberalised energy market&#39; it concluded.

The White Paper
The following year, in 2003 the Labour government&#39;s long-awaited White Paper on energy entitled &#39;Our energy future - creating a low carbon economy&#39;, delayed any decision on nuclear power until after the election in 2005. The document noted that &#39;Before any decision to proceed with the building of new nuclear power stations, there will need to be the fullest public consultation and the publication of a further white paper setting out our proposals&#39;.

In 2004 as the push for renewable energy started in the UK, especially for wind power, so the campaign to undermine renewables gathered pace. Nuclear proponents have consistently argued that renewables are unreliable and inefficient and the only way to save the climate is to have a massive increase in nuclear power.

Blair "Convinced" of Need for Nuclear
Blair has essentially become a victim of this campaign. When he announced his review of the White Paper goals in late November 2005, it is widely believed that he gave the green light to nuclear although the &#39;official&#39; version is that no decision has been made. Despite this, Blair is said to be &#39;convinced&#39; of the pro-nuclear argument.

Other political parties were sceptical that the whole public consultation is just an exercise in spin and manipulation. 'It's a done deal&#39; says Norman Baker, the environment spokesman for the Liberal Democrats. &#39;The inquiry is a fig leaf. The suspicion must be that Tony Blair has already decided to advocate an increase in the use of nuclear power. This review will serve little purpose if the Prime Minister has already made up his mind&#39;.

The week before, on the 22 November, Blair had appeared in front of the Commons Liaison Committee. Because "the facts have changed over the last couple of years", concerning climate change and energy security, Tony Blair told MPs, he believed that nuclear power was once again a serious option to supply a large part of Britain's energy.

Many parts of the press were sceptical about the review, asking the simple question why the government needed yet another energy review so soon after the previous one. &#39; Many suspect that the only reason for another review so soon is because Mr Blair has decided he wants to go nuclear, but needs the authority of a formal inquiry&#39; said the Daily Mail. In January 2006, the review was formally announced seeking &#39;views on the medium and long-term energy policy issues to be considered in the Energy Review&#39;.

Political insiders now say that the pro-nuclear agenda is being driven from within Downing Street, with help from the DTI. But many of Blair's close colleagues are now pro-nuclear.

Nuclear "Back on the Agenda with a Vengeance"
In mid-May, just days after reading a draft of the DTI report into the energy review, Tony Blair spoke to the CBI. His speech "ignited a political storm" by endorsing a new generation of nuclear power stations, before the energy review was even finished. His remarks completely pre-empted the review, leading to his political opponents saying it had been a smokescreen all along.

Blair said: "The facts are stark. By 2025, if current policy is unchanged there will be a dramatic gap on our targets to reduce CO2 emissions, we will become heavily dependent on gas and at the same time move from being 80% to 90% self-reliant in gas to 80% to 90% dependent on foreign imports, mostly from the Middle East, and Africa and Russia".

"These facts put the replacement of nuclear power stations, a big push on renewables and a step change on energy efficiency, engaging both business and consumers, back on the agenda with a vengeance. If we don't take these long-term decisions now we will be committing a serious dereliction of our duty to the future of this country." His speech was the strongest indication yet that nuclear will be given the go-ahead and were warmly welcomed by the nuclear industry. Keith Parker, from the Nuclear Industry Association said the Prime Minister's remarks came at a crucial time: "Nuclear energy is a large-scale, low-carbon source of electricity generation that, as part of a diverse, balanced energy mix, can help to ensure security of energy supply."

I Have "Changed my Mind" on Nuclear
Giving evidence before MPs just days before the Energy Review was officially announced, Blair admitted that he had "changed his mind" over nuclear, going from sceptical to pro. "Whereas we left the question open and we were very sceptical at that point [of the first review], certainly, I'll be totally honest with you, I've changed my mind," he said.

He also said that it was "very difficult" to see how Britain could secure energy supplies and meet emissions goals without replacing nuclear power.

Nuclear Not the Only Answer
On July 11, 2006, annnouncing the results of the energy review, Blair confirmed what everyone already knew that he would give the green light to a new generation of nuclear power plants. Blair said:

"We're about to move to a situation of importing energy. We have to at least replace our nuclear power stations. These decisions have to be taken now. Fifteen years down the line we have got high energy prices and real problems.

"Everyone will concentrate on nuclear but one of the reasons for coming here is to say nuclear is part of the answer, it's not the only answer".

The Pro-Nuclear Spin Doctor

 * David Hill - who replaced Alastair Campbell as Tony Blair's press secretary used to be managing director of PR firm Bell Pottinger Good Relations. One of his clients there was Nirex.

Tobacco industry involvement
The UK Sunday Times Online reported on October 12, 2008 that Tony Blair engineered an exemption from motor racing in a ban on tobacco advertising in exchange for a donation of one million pounds to the Labour party from Bernie Ecclestone, the head of Formula One motor racing in England. IN January, 1997, Ecclestone made the donations to the Labour party. Blair met privately with Ecclestone in October, 1997, and by November 5, his government announced a proposal to exempt F1 from the tobacco sponsorship ban.

In 2004, the UK Guardian reported that Martin Broughton, CEO of British American Tobacco (BAT), successfully pressured Tony Blair into minimizing an investigation into allegations that BAT condoned tax evasion and assisted in smuggling schemes. British politician Stephen Byers threatened to conduct an inquiry into BAT's illegal activities and publish the results, but instead convinced Blair to conduct a watered-down inquiry in secret.

Affiliations

 * Chair, Commission for Africa
 * Member, Africa Progress Panel
 * Patron, Tony Blair Africa Governance Initiative

Awards

 * Winner of the 2003 Thomas J. Dodd Prize in International Justice and Human Rights

Related SourceWatch pages

 * Euan Blair
 * Labour Party
 * Labour Party conference
 * Energy Review (UK 2006)
 * Tony Blair Faith Foundation
 * Yale Center for Faith & Culture

Websites

 * 10 Downing Street official site.
 * The Labour Network A website run by Labour members in support of the Labour Party.
 * Tony Blair Online A Support website on Tony Blair.

Watch / Impeach Tony Blair

 * ImpeachBlair.org, the official site of the group of MP's includes their report, legal opinion, list of supporters and news.
 * Blair Watch, hereinreality.com.
 * Meet the Carlyle Group, hereinreality.com.

Profiles

 * Guardian Unlimited Politics Ask Aristotle: Tony Blair. Voting record, profile, jobs and committees.
 * Tony Blair, TheyWorkForYou.com. Tony Blair speeches and performance data.

Articles & Commentary

 * Rob Evans, David Leigh and Kevin Maguire, "Tobacco firm gained secret access to Blair", The Guardian, October 27, 2004.
 * Andrew Grice, "House of Commons, 4:56pm: The moment Tony Blair lost his authority," The Independent, November 10, 2005.
 * Patrick Wintour and David Hencke, "Ministers say Blair must name day", The Guardian, May 1, 2006.
 * Peter Wilson, "Blair turns N-power switch to go", The Australian, May 17, 2006.
 * DAVID E. SANGER and JIM RUTENBERG, "Bush and Blair Acknowledged Major Iraq Misjudgments", The New York Times, May 16, 2006.
 * Mark Thompson, "Blair and McCain: A Double Blow to Bush," TIME Magazine/CNN, February 21, 2007. also re John McCain